Veteran actor-turned-political commentator Kenneth Okonkwo has sharply criticized the government of Bola Ahmed Tinubu, declaring that the administration has “practically surrendered Nigeria to terrorists.” According to Okonkwo, what used to be isolated incidents of insecurity have now become a nationwide pattern — a sign, he argues, that the government is failing in its most basic duty: protecting citizens.
His remarks come at a time of intensifying violence, mass abductions, and repeated attacks across the country — events that are raising serious questions about the efficiency and resolve of security institutions under the current government.
What’s Behind the Criticism
Escalating Violence and Mass Kidnappings
Recent events have underscored the alarming rate at which security challenges are spiraling. Just this week, attackers abducted hundreds of schoolchildren and teachers from a school in northern Nigeria — in one of the worst mass kidnappings in recent memory.
Despite promises from the federal government to redeploy security officers to protect ordinary citizens and bolster defences, many areas remain vulnerable. Rural villages, schools, churches — all continue to be targeted.
Perceived Shortcomings of Government Response
Critics argue that government responses have often been reactive and symbolic rather than strategic and sustained. For instance, calls for greater security presence, rapid deployment of forces, or improved intelligence have so far not translated into effective protection for vulnerable communities.
For many Nigerians — especially those living in high-risk zones — fear, displacement and loss of livelihood have become a daily reality. Okonkwo’s condemnation reflects widespread frustration in these communities, where the expectation of safety is steadily eroding.
Government Claims: Progress — But Is It Enough?
In response to such criticisms, the government has highlighted what it calls “notable achievements” in the fight against terrorism. According to the federal government:
- Security agencies report that thousands of terrorists and criminals have been neutralised, arrested or surrendered.
- Efforts have been made to curb the supply of arms to non-state actors, destroy intercepted weapons, and dismantle arms-trafficking networks.
- The government recently unveiled a new nationwide counter-terrorism strategy for 2025–2030, aiming to reform security operations and restore public confidence.
These developments suggest that at least on paper, the administration recognises the scale of the problem and is trying to respond systematically.
Why Doubts and Distrust Persist
Even with official figures and programmes, many Nigerians remain unconvinced. Several factors contribute to this skepticism:
- Inconsistent Security Gains: While some arrests and operations are highlighted, attacks — including mass kidnappings — continue unabated, suggesting that gains may be limited or unsustainable.
- Lack of Visible Protection at Community Level: In many affected areas — especially remote or rural zones — people say they still feel unprotected, with no meaningful presence of security forces on the ground.
- Perceived Symbolism Over Substance: Measures such as deploying new police recruits, cancelling official trips, or issuing statements are widely viewed as reactive gestures rather than long-term solutions.
- Public Frustration and Fear: For citizens who have lost loved ones, or who live under constant threat of abduction or violence, official assurances ring hollow — prompting anger, fear, and growing demand for accountability.
In that context, Okonkwo’s condemnation resonates with many who feel the government has effectively abdicated responsibility.
The Stakes Are High: What This Means for Nigeria’s Future
If the trend continues, Nigeria risks more than just a security breakdown. We could see:
- Widespread displacement of communities as fear drives people from their homes.
- Disruption of education — as parents withdraw children from schools perceived as unsafe, or entire institutions shut down.
- Economic decline — when farming, trade, and daily livelihoods are consistently disrupted.
- Deep erosion of trust between the government and citizens — potentially fuelling social unrest, despair, or even radicalisation.
For a nation already grappling with multiple crises, a collapse of basic security could have long-term implications for social cohesion, development, and national stability.
